DEEN
Contact

Home›Leadership Development

Leadership Development

Leadership strength grows through challenges that must be solved now.

The last seminar was nice. Three months later, everything was as before.

MLI builds programs around strategic objectives, real leadership situations, and measurable development goals. Participants solve concrete tasks and are enabled to strengthen their effectiveness in day-to-day leadership.

Leaders in conversation at standing tables during an MLI program
Leadership Lab, leadership circle of an industrial company

Our promise

Leadership development has to change something in daily work.

Leadership decides whether strategy works in daily life.

People need orientation, clear expectations and collaboration that also works under pressure.

Real tasks instead of abstract models.

MLI develops programs from strategy, interviews and current leadership situations. Short inputs lead straight into work on concrete cases.

Programs with results that last.

Leadership programs, learning journeys, workshops and labs for experienced leaders and talents – in Germany and internationally.

80%

80 % of a company’s performance is shaped by leadership behavior.

MLI analysis based on a survey of 250 leaders (2023), the McKinsey study Strategy Beyond the Hockey Stick (2018) and the World Management Survey (2021).

Why programs fizzle out

The bottleneck is not knowledge but attention.

Leaders today lack one thing above all: time. They are usually so tied up in technical and operational issues or booked into meetings that everything seems more urgent than engaging in depth with leadership.

That willingness arises only when participants sense that the material is relevant to them and that the method quickly helps them act with more composure, be more effective and sleep better at night. A standard curriculum or off-the-shelf training hits that by chance. A program derived from the strategy and built from interviews with those involved hits it with precision.

That is why every MLI program begins not with a list of modules but with a question: What is occupying your leadership team right now, and what is holding it back?

Our aim: participants recognize themselves in the cases discussed, and the didactic design creates a process of insight that benefits everyone.

Neurosocial leadership

The logic of impact in the team.

Leadership means influencing people so that they achieve shared goals. Leaders today know more about leadership than ever. Yet one decisive question often remains unanswered: How does concrete leadership behavior affect the team?

People are social beings. They constantly check whether they belong, how others see them and what prospects they have in a community. Exclusion can hurt. Uncertainty ties up attention and can trigger stress.

Employees therefore read their leaders’ words, decisions and moods as signals about their position and future in the company. A careless remark can unsettle an entire team – even if it was meant differently.

The neuro traffic light

Tools such as the neuro traffic light help leaders perceive these dynamics, reflect on their own impact and steer situations deliberately. This allows them to facilitate clearly and communicate in a motivating way even under pressure.

Participants in MLI leadership programs report that the neurosocial perspective has changed how they see their own work and helped them achieve more with less stress.

Read more in the article on neurosocial leadership

Keynote in front of leaders in the auditorium in Tutzing
Keynote at the Future of Leadership Conference
Participants working at standing tables in the World Café
MLI World Café: perspectives in rotating rounds
A listener in the audience, focused and attentive
Active listening in a leadership dialogue

Evidence

What you can measure us by

Brandon Hall Group HCM Excellence Award in Gold for Excellence in Leadership Development, 2021

Brandon Hall Excellence Award, Gold

Best global program for business­transformation

The award went to a program we delivered for and with Allianz. You will find the description below.

+103 %Leadership effectivenessfrom 36 to 73 points
74Net Promoter Scoreleadership programs
20,000+Participantsin leadership formats

How we measured. Leadership effectiveness: standardized survey of all participants as part of the employee engagement survey, Likert scale from 0 to 10, before the start and after fifteen months, n = 3,500. The Net Promoter Score is collected from all participants after each program: 62 programs evaluated since 2020, n = 1,420 responses, weighted average across all answers. Participants: internal records, as of August 2026.

Examples from practice

Three programs, each for a specific purpose.

Global insurance group

Objective: 5,000 leaders worldwide were to be introduced to the new corporate culture of an inclusive performance society. A virtual learning platform and virtual workshop formats were implemented for international networking.

Approach:

  1. Interviews with the board on objectives and expectations of leaders. Capture of the most important learning needs and open questions among participating leaders.
  2. Co-creative design of discussion forums and case studies with the client’s project team. Integration of existing tools, targeted introduction of new methods.
  3. Digital learning spaces to simulate concrete cases and leadership situations through self-directed learning. The results could be used directly to convey the new working culture to teams.
  4. Facilitated virtual workshops in which groups of 20 participants aligned their understanding of leadership and solved concrete leadership dilemmas together.

Result:

  • A shared understanding of leadership for all leaders in more than 40 countries
  • Concrete, usable leadership tools for feedback, role allocation and delegation in the team, and for difficult conversations
  • An NPS of 72 among participating leaders

Mechanical engineering company

Objective: To prepare a group of strong specialist leaders for C-level roles. They were to take on responsibility at the top level in the future but had little experience in developing a strategic target picture and winning an organization over to it.

Approach: Interviews revealed three development areas. They led to a program with three two-day in-person blocks, virtual inputs and concrete leadership tasks:

  1. Strategic thinking: recognizing trends (focus on the China wave and AI), developing a viable vision and communicating it convincingly (including presentation technique).
  2. Understanding customers and innovation: grasping customer value, developing and testing ideas as prototypes – in an AI innovation center.
  3. Leading oneself and change: reflecting on one’s own leadership behavior, dealing with uncertainty, understanding the psychology of change and developing concrete behavioral strategies.

Result:

  • Theses on the future for the entire company, discussed with the board
  • A clear roadmap for strengthening one’s own leadership impact
  • A cross-border network that lasted beyond the program

Mid-sized food company

Objective: Badische Staatsbrauerei Rothaus wanted to give all 35 of its leaders future-ready leadership skills together. This included a holistic understanding of strategy, effective team leadership and effective delegation.

Approach: The analysis revealed focal points for a 24-month program:

  1. Executing strategy: shaping continuous change, clarifying the contribution of one’s own team and anchoring strategic goals in decisive everyday situations.
  2. Self-management: regulating one’s own state and dealing confidently with uncertainty and stress. Using the neuro traffic light to work specifically on personal stressors, development areas and strengths.
  3. Leading and communicating effectively: handling objections, conveying difficult messages, delegating with a focus on results and holding strengths-based conversations.

Result:

  • Leaders were able to represent strategic decisions comprehensibly and translate them to their area of responsibility.
  • Leaders and employees used a shared, constructive language to talk about conflicts and resistance.
  • Leaders built connections with one another and developed a strong sense of togetherness.

Feedback

What clients say about working with us

MLI is a partner that inspires us every time: in program design as in delivery, which is authentic and brings participants along. Behind it stand their own executive-level experience, a strong expert network and a view of technology that stays constructive rather than alarmist. What convinces us most is the practical impact.
Head of Leadership Developmentmechanical engineering group
Working with MLI is based on trust, and we do not get a simple standard concept but individual, needs-based and creative solutions. These find high acceptance across the whole organization. The leadership events are perfect and well thought through, planned down to the detail and delivered to a high standard.
Sandrina HübnerHead Corporate Organisation and HR, Swiss Life Germany
In working with MLI, our leaders are particularly enthusiastic about the good, practice-oriented examples and the speakers matched to our needs.
Christian RaschSole Board Member, Badische Staatsbrauerei Rothaus AG

How we work

Three commitments that determine everything else

Relevance before curriculum

Content is derived from the strategy and current challenges, not chosen from a catalog. Whatever does not meet a real question from the participants is cut, even if it is good.

Learning in practice instead of lectures

Inputs are short and serve the work that follows. Most of the time belongs to the participants’ real cases: the difficult message, the blocked project, the conflict in the team. Input, reflection, simulation. Problem-solving.

Results that last

No format ends with a photo record; each ends with concrete results that can be used afterwards: a team mission, a motivating story, a goal framework, a clarification of roles, a leadership rhythm, a list of clear accountabilities.

From assignment to program

Five steps to an effective program

Insights and new topics flow back in01ContextStrategy, target picture02InterviewsTopics and language03Co-creationCases and design04DesignMaterials, staffing05Adjusting courseWhat works, stays

The next step

Three ways to explore a possible collaboration.

30 minutes to get to know each other and spar with Sebastian Morgner. We clarify what is currently challenging your leadership and which format fits. We also say clearly if MLI is not the right partner for it.

30 minutes

Personal conversation

A first meeting, an exchange about your needs, not a sales pitch. Choose a time directly in the calendar, with no intermediate step and at no cost.

Choose a time

Five fields

Contact by e-mail

Describe your topic briefly: one or two sentences are enough. We reply within two business days.
Prefer to talk? +49 8807 244446-0

Go to the contact form

PDF · 21 pages

Institute dossier

Methodology, survey instrument, reference architectures, fee models and network profiles — for forwarding internally when an initiative still needs to be justified.

Download the dossier

Questions and answers

What program owners ask us most often.

What is leadership development?

Leadership development is the systematic development of leadership competence in an organization — from the individual leader to entire leadership populations. It comprises programs, workshops, conferences and accompanying coaching. The difference from a training catalog is that content is derived from the strategy and from interviews rather than from an existing offering.

What matters in leadership development?

On relevance. The bottleneck is not knowledge — there are plenty of models and courses. It is the willingness to engage with something in depth. That only arises when participants work on their real cases and when the level above them pulls in the same direction. A program that does not involve the target group’s superiors can create a good feeling in the short term, but it changes nothing about what people experience day to day. Good leadership programs always relate to the strategy and translate its core content and values into lived leadership behavior.

What does an external partner bring?

Three things that are hard to produce internally: an unbiased view of one’s own patterns, comparative knowledge from other organizations and a space in which leaders can speak openly without consequences for their careers. Plus capacity — internal HR development is usually stretched to the limit.

What does the proposal process look like?

It starts with a conversation about the situation, not about formats. We then review the status quo, hold interviews with key people and define a relevant assignment together with the client. Only then does an offer take shape, with modules, staffing and fees. After that we work out practical cases with a core group. From commissioning to the first module usually takes 6–8 weeks.

How is effectiveness measured?

Measuring the effect of our programs matters to us. What form that takes depends strongly on the context and the target group. The measuring points are defined before the program starts. Usually we ask, before and after a program, about the importance and the level of attainment of defined learning goals.

As a rule we survey participants at the end of every format. More important to us, however, is whether the agreements and plans are still being carried out at the follow-up four weeks later. In strategic programs we measure engagement and understanding of the strategy before and after, and in execution programs also the success rate of defined key results.

What forms of leadership development are there?

Leadership development should not be organized around formats but around the purpose of a measure. It can include conferences, workshops, focused learning formats, self-directed learning, coaching and mentoring. MLI develops learning journeys with clients that follow a clear purpose and measurable goals. It has proven useful to combine large-group formats for information and a sense of the mood, workshops for concrete work on leadership topics, and coaching for individual obstacles. Peer case consultation or exchange in trusted teams gives it lasting effect.

Our stance: never training for its own sake. It should always be tied into the company’s strategy.

↑Top