Skip to content
DEEN
Contact

Home›AI Transformation

AI Transformation

If you do not lead AI,
it will lead you.

Everyone is talking about AI. Everyone is doing their own thing. How do we set this up wisely?

MLI combines strategic perspective, technical judgment, and leadership expertise. This helps leadership teams prioritize the most important areas of value creation and structure their AI transformation.

Our promise

AI transformation needs clarity and structure.

The AI shift confronts leadership with three risks: making the wrong decisions at the start, waiting too long, or creating chaos through rushed action.

AI is changing business models and organizations. It calls for a fundamentally new approach that brings rapid technological development into line with people’s capacity for change.

Neutral expertise from outside: MLI quickly and effectively gives leadership teams an objective strategic perspective, a technological overview and a value-oriented, systematic approach.

Getting into action fast and systematically: In a workshop we clarify the levers of success for your company and support leadership teams in setting up and throughout the AI transformation.

What it is about

Find out how your company can use AI most effectively.

Many companies have long had assistants, pilots and platforms in place. But activity alone does not create impact. Quite the opposite: quickly generated AI documents can paralyze collaboration, because the attention of the people who have to read them is limited.

Business impact with AI means:

  • We can use AI to measurably improve the customer experience or product quality – with a positive contribution to value.
  • We can enable employees to achieve better performance and results for our company faster with the help of AI.
  • We can save costs and reduce risks through reliable automation.
  • We have a clear target picture of an organization and world of work in which people and AI complement each other.

The entry point

A valuable way in: the AI Course Setting.

What. A compact workshop for your management team — top management and selected key people.

With whom. MLI experts who, as neutral sparring partners, cover all relevant aspects — strategy and leadership, AI architecture, AI strategy. Experience meets experience, business expertise meets transformation know-how.

What for. The right moment for a common thread to emerge — more than that: clarity and structure. At the end there are decisions rather than declarations of intent; what comes next follows from them.

AI Course Setting at a glance

Duration
One compact working day, about 5½ hours
Participants
Top management and key people, 6 to 15 people
Fees
€9,500 flat fee for two MLI experts, preparation, delivery and documentation of results; plus VAT
Preparation
Your team’s compass profiles, analyzed before the session
Travel expenses
None in the Greater Munich area; otherwise at actual cost

Request the AI Course Setting

Send us an e-mail — you will receive a proposed date and the preparation materials.

The agenda · an example

  1. Input: what decides a successful AI transformation 30 min
  2. Stocktaking with the AI Leadership Compass — success factors for your company 90 min
  3. Sketching the target picture: the AI-empowered organization 75 min
  4. Role and competencies of leadership in the age of AI 60 min
  5. Decisions and next steps 30 min

We adapt the agenda to your situation — the stocktaking stays.

On request

The AI Future Workshop

MLI has proven expertise in making the best use of the experiential knowledge of large groups. If you want to develop a shared AI target picture with employees or all your leaders, this offering could be the right one.

An activation format for up to 100 people with facilitated groups, design-thinking methods and an aggregated stocktaking. The fee depends on group size and facilitation design.

Request the Future Workshop

Think first, then act.

What you should clarify at the start of the AI transformation:

  • An honest assessment of the most important fields of action (AI compass).
  • The use cases with the highest strategic benefit (AI course setting or Future Workshop).
  • A shared target picture for the future collaboration of employees and AI.
  • The decisive bottlenecks and levers of success (AI course setting).
  • A reliable process mechanism that ensures concrete progress and at the same time allows pilots without the expected benefit to be stopped deliberately.
  • A clear roadmap for the next 12 months.
  • Concrete objectives and key results for the next AI sprint.

Why it matters

Three theses on AI transformation.

If you disagree, we are glad to argue the point. Provided you really want to move something.

01

Waiting is not a neutral position

Those who do not lead AI will be led by it. The technology is developing so fast that companies without AI practice quickly fall behind. Or they rely on external vendors without a decision compass of their own.

02

AI competence requires an entirely new kind of learning

In the past, people shone through knowledge. Today, AI knows almost everything. What counts is practical experience. An AI transformation has to treat AI like an intelligent new colleague with whom you quickly and practically try out working together.

03

AI success needs structure and leadership

AI agents can scale the capabilities of employees many times over. But they have to be led. Someone must take responsibility for what they do. And they should create measurable value.

The expert team

AI strategy, AI architecture and leadership at one table.

Three perspectives that should not come from providers with vested interests.

Portrait of Sebastian Morgner
Sebastian Morgner Strategy and leadership

Managing Partner of MLI, twenty years of management consulting and executive coaching, more than 60 strategic transformations accompanied; co-founder of the Zukunftsallianz Mensch & KI, an alliance on humans and AI. In the mandate: leads the process, facilitates the leadership team and is responsible for the execution rhythm.

Waiting is not a neutral position. Those who do not lead will be led.

Portrait of Dr. Tobias Große-Puppendahl
Dr. Tobias Große-Puppendahl AI architecture

Principal Enterprise Architect Data & AI at Porsche AG, where he is responsible for building the group-wide GenAI platform for some 60,000 employees; PhD in computer science (TU Darmstadt), more than 30 patents. In the mandate: examines questions of architecture, data and governance and makes effort estimates realistic.

You swap models in days. Your terms, processes and rules — not so.

Portrait of Tristan Post
Tristan Post AI strategy

Founder and CEO of the AI Strategy Institute, Faculty Member for GenAI at Boston Consulting Group, lecturer at the Technical University of Munich; author of AI Native (Hanser). In the mandate: assesses use cases by business benefit and brings market comparison into prioritization.

Whoever instructs an AI is also responsible for what comes out of it.

The evidence

What has changed measurably.

Real project examples.

12monthsfrom understanding the problem to an AI-native business model
Time to market reduced from 24 to 7 months.months time to marketproduct features of a SaaS company

How we measured. 1. From the decision to implement the business model AI-natively to its implementation. 2. SaaS example: time to market measures the span from the strategy-relevant requirement to availability for customers — here: product features of a software company.

Client voices

What clients say about us.

With Sebastian Morgner and MLI we worked out the opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence for our business model. It was a perfect mix of structure and inspiration, and we discovered new possibilities.

At the end of the workshop, our management team shared a common picture of how to use AI, prioritized use cases and a clear plan to anchor and implement the topic systematically.
Frank SattlerCEO Techpilot
In the last two years our company has more than tripled. An essential part of that was working with MLI. The structured approach with OKRs was a real game changer for us as a management team.

What sets Sebastian Morgner apart: his questions get to the root of every challenge. He has made an important contribution to our development.
David NeuhausCEO Social Hub
For us as a management team, Sebastian Morgner is like a highly competent, benevolent friend who accompanies us on our transformation. Working together helps us respond quickly to changes in our environment and maximize our impact as top management.
Johannes ElsnerCOO Allianz Global Investors

Evidence from practice

Typical projects: three case examples.

Procurement platform, mechanical engineering

Objective: From AI roadmap to AI-native business model. Europe’s leading procurement platform for mechanical engineering wanted to assess the opportunities and risks of AI for its business model. There were many ideas but no shared target picture and no prioritization.

Approach: AI compass stocktaking, one-day Future Workshop with the management team, prioritization with the AI Utilization Matrix, AI roadmap with responsibilities.

Result: on this basis, Techpilot went on to implement its business model AI-natively within twelve months and opened up a new market: increasingly automated procurement processes.

For decision-makers: AI can open an existing business model to new customer groups — beyond pure process automation.

SaaS provider, social media

Objective: Recognizing the potential of artificial intelligence early. One of the three market leaders for social media software in the DACH region recognized early that technological progress requires a fast and flexible transformation.

Approach: As early as 2019: development of an AI product vision with stakeholders and customers. Continuous market and SWOT analysis with the management team. Shaping the company’s development through three-month strategy sprints that take the transformation aspects into account.

Result: deliberate development into a hybrid company with employees in 14 countries. Adaptation of the product and the organization, above all product and development process, to the requirements of AI. Delivery of the strategic plan with 20% annual growth despite various crises and market disruptions.

For decision-makers: in fast-changing markets it is essential that management regularly steps back to a bird’s-eye view and re-examines and redefines the current levers of success.

Financial services company

Objective: Realignment through AI. An established financial company is moving its legacy core system to a new, AI-enabled platform to reduce administrative costs and open up new market potential.

Approach: Establishing an AI transformation mechanism to lead a complex large-scale project with several hundred participants. Clarifying roles, value creation and the roll-out process to accelerate velocity. Developing a shared target picture for using strategic potential.

Result: a shared target picture in the leadership team regarding strategic options and direction. Less time for coordination, reporting and escalations — measurably more time for implementing market-relevant features. Higher velocity.

What we do

Seven steps, one logic: value before tools.

From the framework to the reimagined organization — in the order that has proven itself in practice.

Effective AI potential01FrameworkRules,Enablement02Target pictureSet the yardstick03CoalitionWin thepioneers04PrioritizeChoose valuepools05SprintsQuarterlypit stop06ScaleRoll out whatworks07OrganizationNew roles andagent governance
  1. Optimize the prerequisites 1–3 monthsAppropriate AI infrastructure and support at the workplace. Binding rules of play. Time allowances for experimenting with AI. Enablement for effective use.
  2. Define ambition and target picture 2 daysAn honest assessment: where do we stand? What would be possible with AI? Where do we want to go? Without a yardstick for success, every later assessment remains a matter of taste.
  3. Cross-functional AI coalition 2–4 weeksAI pioneers and multipliers who are ready to build AI competence for the company and to contribute to executing AI projects.
  4. Prioritize use cases 1 monthWhere does human work offer the greater value, and where does the use of AI? Which use cases hold the greatest potential, and where do AI agents make the most sense? A facilitated design thinking process.
  1. AI sprints 4 weeks each, ongoingAI pilots are implemented and refined until they are ready for roll-out — with user reviews and impact measurement. A pit stop every three months: what do we continue, what do we stop, what do we try anew?
  2. Scaling and roll-out ongoingBring successful pilots to scale. Ensure employees handle AI solutions consistently. Continuous quality control and further development along the lines of KAIZEN.
  3. A future-ready organization 1–3 monthsJob profiles for humans and AI, decision rights, transparency about decision paths. Every agent receives a role profile and a named person responsible for it.

What every scaled use case needs

  • an expected contribution to value
  • a person responsible
  • measurable success criteria
  • a stop criterion
  • a decision date: scale, adjust or stop

What we are responsible for, and what we are not

MLI takes responsibility for the process of deriving strategic use cases and for facilitating and designing the execution mechanism. Technical implementation is delivered by your internal teams or specialized implementation partners. If needed, we help clarify requirements and select suitable partners, and receive no commission for doing so.

Who it is for

Who we are a good fit for.

The entry point pays off in a particular situation — we would rather say so before than after.

A good fit

  • Companies where AI is already in use — but without a clear strategic framework
  • A management team that takes part itself
  • The willingness to stop ongoing initiatives if they cannot prove their benefit
  • The ambition to build your own AI competence instead of buying it in permanently
  • A company that also cares about the human side of the transformation and wants to strengthen and involve its employees deliberately

Not such a good fit

  • Those who want to delegate the AI transformation entirely to IT or external providers
  • Those who need a technical maturity score for the supervisory board — the compass provides a profile, not a benchmark
  • Those who see the AI transformation mainly as cost savings rather than a unique opportunity to tap new potential
  • Those who want to justify a workforce reduction that has already been decided

The next step

Let’s talk about your situation.

30 minutes

Personal conversation

A first meeting, an exchange about your needs, not a sales pitch. Choose a time directly in the calendar, with no intermediate step and at no cost.

Choose a time

Five fields

Contact by e-mail

Describe your topic briefly: one or two sentences are enough. We reply within two business days.
Prefer to talk? +49 8807 244446-0

Go to the contact form

PDF · 21 pages

Institute dossier

Methodology, survey instrument, reference architectures, fee models and network profiles — for forwarding internally when an initiative still needs to be justified.

Download the dossier

Workbook · free of charge

Where do you stand in the AI transformation?

Take stock across eight fields of action, assessed on the verifiable current state, not on intentions.

Questions and answers

What decision-makers ask us first.

Five short answers. In more depth, gladly, in conversation.

What is the AI Leadership Compass, and what is it not?

The AI Leadership Compass is a structured instrument for reflection and dialogue in leadership teams, giving a complete picture of where the AI transformation stands. It covers eight relevant fields of action and 48 statements. Key people assess these against the verifiable state of the past six months — first alone, then in comparison across the team, where the divergence matters, not the average. It is not a validated diagnostic test and not a maturity model, but a strategic instrument for recognizing the levers of a successful AI transformation.

We already have an AI strategy. What does the AI Course Setting add?

The conditions for AI transformation are changing rapidly right now. You cannot formulate a long-term strategy; you need clear principles and continuous iteration to meet this challenge. The AI Course Setting is a strategic pit stop in which a leadership team systematically assesses the relevant levers and decides which next steps create the greatest value for the company.

What helps here is the discussion with experts who have an overview of current technological developments and of what has worked in other companies and organizations. The distance between a strategic decision and demonstrable activity is regularly the real subject.

Are you really neutral?

MLI sells no software, no licenses and no implementation, and receives no commission when we help select implementation partners. That is why we can also advise against an investment. In MLI mandates, our experts work exclusively in an advisory role; should a recommendation touch on the interests of anyone involved, we disclose it on our own initiative before a decision is made.

What does the entry point cost, and what comes after?

The AI Course Setting costs a flat €9,500 — for two MLI experts, preparation, delivery and documentation of results, plus VAT and, where applicable, travel expenses; we charge none in the Greater Munich area. The AI Future Workshop for the entire leadership level is quoted according to group size and facilitation design. What comes next is your decision: a follow-on mandate is neither a condition nor the purpose of the session.

What is your stance on co-determination and the EU AI Act?

We treat co-determination as a prerequisite, not an obstacle: employees and their works councils belong at the table early, otherwise the transformation tips over later. Four statements in the compass concern minimum requirements such as an inventory of applications, named responsibility and shutdown procedures — we read them individually, not as an average. This does not replace a legal or data protection review; the reference to the AI Act is a pointer, not legal advice.

What is the best way to approach an AI transformation?

That depends on the context and the starting conditions. In our work, this sequence has proven itself: first, define the ambition, that is, top management’s acceptance criteria; second, open the learning journey, so that all employees read the effort as an opportunity; third, a Big Think Day at which the strategically most important use cases are prioritized; fourth, mission-driven teams that pilot these cases, released from other duties; fifth, a sprint rhythm on a quarterly or four-monthly cycle; sixth, bundle the knowledge into AI identities, that is, assistants for each area; seventh, rethink the organization, with new task profiles and led agents.

The Leadership Insights article From intent to impact describes this in detail.

↑Top